Abstract
<p>The thickness of the magnetized layer in the crust (or lithosphere) holds valuable information about the thermal state and composition of the lithosphere. Commonly, maps of magnetic thickness are estimated by spectral methods that are applied to individual data windows of the measured magnetic field strength. In each window, the measured power spectrum is fit by a theoretical function which depends on the average magnetic thickness in the window and a ‘fractal’ parameter describing the spatial roughness of the magnetic sources. The limitations of the spectral approach have long been recognized and magnetic thickness inversions are routinely calibrated using heat flow measurements, based on the assumption that magnetic thickness corresponds to Curie depth. However, magnetic spectral thickness determinations remain highly uncertain, underestimate uncertainties, do not properly integrate heat flow measurements into the inversion and fail to address the inherent trade-off between lateral thickness and susceptibility variations.</p><p>We present a linearized Bayesian inversion that works in space domain and addresses many issues of previous depth determination approaches. The ‘fractal’ description used in the spectral approaches translates into a Matérn covariance function in space domain. We use a Matérn covariance function to describe both the spatial behaviour of susceptibility and magnetic thickness. In a first step, the parameters governing the spatial behaviour are estimated from magnetic data and heat flow data using a Bayesian formulation and the Monte-Carlo-Markov-Chain (MCMC) technique. The second step uses the ensemble of parameter solution from MCMC to generate an ensemble of susceptibility and thickness distributions, which are the main output of our approach.</p><p>The newly developed framework is applied to synthetic data at satellite height (300 km) covering an area of 6000 x 6000 km. These tests provide insight into the sensitivity of satellite magnetic data to susceptibility and thickness. Furthermore, they highlight that magnetic inversion benefits greatly from a tight integration of heat flow measurements into the inversion process.</p>
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.