Abstract

Abstract. In this paper we introduce a Bayesian framework, which is explicit about prior assumptions, for using model ensembles and observations together to constrain future climate change. The emergent constraint approach has seen broad application in recent years, including studies constraining the equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) using the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and the mid-Pliocene Warm Period (mPWP). Most of these studies were based on ordinary least squares (OLS) fits between a variable of the climate state, such as tropical temperature, and climate sensitivity. Using our Bayesian method, and considering the LGM and mPWP separately, we obtain values of ECS of 2.7 K (0.6–5.2, 5th–95th percentiles) using the PMIP2, PMIP3, and PMIP4 datasets for the LGM and 2.3 K (0.5–4.4) with the PlioMIP1 and PlioMIP2 datasets for the mPWP. Restricting the ensembles to include only the most recent version of each model, we obtain 2.7 K (0.7–5.2) using the LGM and 2.3 K (0.4–4.5) using the mPWP. An advantage of the Bayesian framework is that it is possible to combine the two periods assuming they are independent, whereby we obtain a tighter constraint of 2.5 K (0.8–4.0) using the restricted ensemble. We have explored the sensitivity to our assumptions in the method, including considering structural uncertainty, and in the choice of models, and this leads to 95 % probability of climate sensitivity mostly below 5 K and only exceeding 6 K in a single and most uncertain case assuming a large structural uncertainty. The approach is compared with other approaches based on OLS, a Kalman filter method, and an alternative Bayesian method. An interesting implication of this work is that OLS-based emergent constraints on ECS generate tighter uncertainty estimates, in particular at the lower end, an artefact due to a flatter regression line in the case of lack of correlation. Although some fundamental challenges related to the use of emergent constraints remain, this paper provides a step towards a better foundation for their potential use in future probabilistic estimations of climate sensitivity.

Highlights

  • In recent years, researchers have identified a number of relationships between observational properties and a future climate change, which was not immediately obvious a priori but which exists across the ensemble of global climate models (GCMs) (Allen and Ingram, 2002; Hall and Qu, 2006; Boé et al, 2009; Cox et al, 2018) participating in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP)

  • We focus on the relationship between equilibrium climate sensitivity, defined here as S, and the temperature change in the tropics which is observed at the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and the mid-Pliocene Warm Period, defined as Ttropical

  • To compare with our previous analysis, we investigate the effect of the model inadequacy using the dataset of PMIP2 and PMIP3 combined for the case of the LGM and the dataset of PlioMIP1 for the case of the mid-Pliocene Warm Period (mPWP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Researchers have identified a number of relationships between observational properties and a future climate change, which was not immediately obvious a priori but which exists across the ensemble of global climate models (GCMs) (Allen and Ingram, 2002; Hall and Qu, 2006; Boé et al, 2009; Cox et al, 2018) participating in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) These relationships are generally referred to as “emergent constraints” as they emerge from the ensemble behaviour as a whole rather than from explicit physical analysis. We present an alternative Bayesian linear regression approach in which the regression relationship is used as a likelihood model for the problem This allows the prior over the predictand to be defined separately from and entirely independently of the model ensemble and emergent constraint analysis. We discuss the influences of the prior and model inadequacy on climate sensitivity in Sect. 3.5 and 3.6, respectively

Methods
Ordinary least squares
Bayesian framework
Kalman filter
Climate models and data
MIROC 2 IPSL 3 CCSM 4 ECHAM 5 FGOALS 6 HadCM3b 7 ECBILTb
10 MIROC-ESM
22 NorESM-L 23 FGOALS-g2b
Applications and results
The Last Glacial Maximum
The mid-Pliocene Warm Period
Inclusion of CMIP6 and PMIP4 data
Combining multiple constraints
Alternative priors on sensitivity
Model inadequacy
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call