Abstract

Ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are a popular approach to quantitatively model molecular networks based on biological knowledge. However, such knowledge is typically restricted. Wrongly modelled biological mechanisms as well as relevant external influence factors that are not included into the model are likely to manifest in major discrepancies between model predictions and experimental data. Finding the exact reasons for such observed discrepancies can be quite challenging in practice. In order to address this issue, we suggest a Bayesian approach to estimate hidden influences in ODE-based models. The method can distinguish between exogenous and endogenous hidden influences. Thus, we can detect wrongly specified as well as missed molecular interactions in the model. We demonstrate the performance of our Bayesian dynamic elastic-net with several ordinary differential equation models from the literature, such as human JAK–STAT signalling, information processing at the erythropoietin receptor, isomerization of liquid α-Pinene, G protein cycling in yeast and UV-B triggered signalling in plants. Moreover, we investigate a set of commonly known network motifs and a gene-regulatory network. Altogether our method supports the modeller in an algorithmic manner to identify possible sources of errors in ODE-based models on the basis of experimental data.

Highlights

  • Mathematical models of biological systems become more and more complex and contribute important insights into various biological processes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

  • The model of the UV-B signalling in plants systematically links several signalling events induced by UV-B light to a comprehensive informational signalling pathway [35]

  • Mathematical modellers in systems biology are frequently confronted with incomplete knowledge and limited understanding of a complex biochemical system [9,10,11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mathematical models of biological systems become more and more complex and contribute important insights into various biological processes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Since biological systems are naturally open, formulating mathematical models and specifying their boundaries is a highly non-trivial task [8,9]. Most researchers in systems biology are faced with the still unsolved issue to find a compromise between model complexity and the limited amount of knowledge, data and time [9,10,11]. Current research is mostly focused on inference of perturbation effects and model selection [13,14,15]. Statistical model selection and related methods require

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call