Abstract

The World Anti-doping Agency currently collates the results of all doping tests for athletes involved in elite sporting competition with the aim of improving the fight against doping. Existing anti-doping strategies involve either the direct detection of use of banned substances, or abnormal variation in metabolites or biological markers related to their use. As the aim of any doping regime is to enhance athlete competitive performance, it is interesting to consider whether performance data could be used within the fight against doping. In this regard, the identification of unexpected increases in athlete performance could be used as a trigger for their closer scrutiny via a targeted anti-doping testing programme. This study proposes a Bayesian framework for the development of an “athlete performance passport” and documents some initial findings and limitations of such an approach. The Bayesian model was retrospectively applied to the competitive results of 1,115 shot put athletes from 1975 to 2016 in order establish the interindividual variability of intraindividual performance in order to create individualized career performance trajectories for a large number of presumed clean athletes. Data from athletes convicted for doping violations (3.69% of the sample) was used to assess the predictive performance of the Bayesian framework with a probit model. Results demonstrate the ability to detect performance differences (~1 m) between doped and presumed clean athletes, and achieves good predictive performance of doping status (i.e., doped vs. non-doped) with a high area under the curve (AUC = 0.97). However, the model prediction of doping status was driven by the correct classification of presume non-doped athletes, misclassifying doped athletes as non-doped. This lack of sensitivity is likely due to the need to accommodate additional longitudinal covariates (e.g., aging and seasonality effects) potentially affecting performance into the framework. Further research is needed in order to increase the framework structure and improve its accuracy and sensitivity.

Highlights

  • Over the last decade the fight against doping in sports has evolved from purely biochemical testing for specific substances, to longitudinal profiling of specific biomarkers in the form of the athlete biological passport (ABP)

  • Other anti-doping initiatives as outlined in the WADA technical document for sport specific analysis, signifies a move toward a more forensic intelligence led anti-doping system, which gathers broader sources of information to inform the planning of doping tests (WADA, 2016)

  • In order to assess the feasibility of an athlete performance passport (APP) approach, this study explores the important issue of modeling and analyzing the relationship between doping status and athlete performance accounting for some of the other covariates that impact on performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last decade the fight against doping in sports has evolved from purely biochemical testing for specific substances, to longitudinal profiling of specific biomarkers in the form of the athlete biological passport (ABP). On a global perspective, (Schumacher and Pottgiesser, 2009) demonstrate marked improvements in world best performances in male 5,000 and 10,000 m running performances following the commercial introduction of recombinant erythropoietin in the 1990s. They highlight a down turn in female world best discus performances following the introduction of out-of-competition anti-doping tests for anabolic steroids in the late 1980s. It is possible to question whether longitudinal tracking of athlete performance might provide additional information (alongside haematological and steroidal ABP modules) that can be used as part of the intelligence gathering process to inform anti-doping organization’s testing programmes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call