Abstract
The relationship between stock return volatility and trading volume is analysed by using the modified mixture model (MMM) framework proposed by Andersen (1996). This theory postulates that price changes and volumes are driven by a common latent information process, which is commonly interpreted as the volatility. Using GMM estimation Andersen finds that the persistence in this latent process falls when a bivariate model of returns and volume, i.e. the MMM, is estimated instead of a univariate model for returns. This empirical finding is inconsistent with the MMM. As opposed to Andersen's study we apply recently developed simulation techniques based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). A clear advantage of MCMC methods is that estimates of volatility are readily available for use in, for example, dynamic portfolio allocation and option pricing applications. Using Andersen's data for IBM we find that the persistence of volatility remains high in the bivariate case. This suggests that the choice of the estima...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.