Abstract

In sample survey on field experiment, samples have to be sampled at random in principle, but samples are often taken systematically due to restriction of time, labor and plot area. In order to get information on precision of the sampling methods in survey of quantitative characters in a hand-transplanted rice field, the error of some sampling methods were compared with that of random sampling. The characters surveyed were tiller number, panicle number and fresh weight both at maximum tiller number and full heading stage. The following sampling method was simple and precise at both growth stage, because its error was almost equal to the error of random sampling: split the experimental plot into four sub-plots by bisectors of length and width, then, sample continuous 10 hills in the direction of a planting row from two sub-plots located diagonally. At full heading stage, when CV of these characters were small, the other two sampling methods were also practical: (1)Sample continuous 20 hills in the direction of a planting row. (2)First, sample continuous 10 hills in the direction of a planting row, then change row to be sampled to the next one on the right or left side, then sample continuous 10 hills in the same direction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.