Abstract

ABSTRACT Only 20 per cent of old field stars have detectable debris discs, leaving open the question of what disc, if any, is present around the remaining 80 per cent. Young moving groups allow to probe this population, since discs are expected to have been brighter early on. This paper considers the population of F stars in the 23 Myr-old β Pictoris moving group (BPMG) where we find that 9/12 targets possess discs. We also analyse archival ALMA data to derive radii for four of the discs, presenting the first image of the 63 au radius disc of HD 164249. Comparing the BPMG results to disc samples from ∼45-Myr and ∼150-Myr-old moving groups, and to discs found around field stars, we find that the disc incidence rate in young moving groups is comparable to that of the BPMG and significantly higher than that of field stars. The BPMG discs tend to be smaller than those around field stars. However, this difference is not statistically significant due to the small number of targets. Yet, by analysing the fractional luminosity versus disc radius parameter space, we find that the fractional luminosities in the populations considered drop by two orders of magnitude within the first 100 Myr. This is much faster than expected by collisional evolution, implying a decay equivalent to 1/age2. We attribute this depletion to embedded planets, which would be around 170 Mearth to cause a depletion on the appropriate time-scale. However, we cannot rule out that different birth environments of nearby young clusters result in brighter debris discs than the progenitors of field stars that likely formed in a more dense environment.

Highlights

  • After its protoplanetary disc has dispersed, a star is left with - if anything - a system of planets and debris belts

  • The disc around HD 164249 was observed with Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) at 1.35 mm and is spatially resolved for the first time increasing the number of resolved debris discs reported in the literature to 153 according to the database for resolved discs2

  • We note that our data-set does contain the data used in Kral et al (2020), but a combination of those with data from the “Resolved ALMA and SMA Observations of Nearby Stars” (REASONS) programme (Sepulveda et al 2019) which have a higher spatial resolution, as well as older observations from 2012

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

After its protoplanetary disc has dispersed, a star is left with - if anything - a system of planets and debris belts The dust in those debris belts is inferred to originate in the break-up of planetesimals at least kilometres in size (e.g., Wyatt 2008; Krivov 2010; Hughes et al 2018), and is seen in far-infrared (FIR) surveys towards ∼20% of nearby several Gyr-old stars (e.g., Eiroa et al 2013; Sibthorpe et al 2018), where a slightly higher detection rate is noted for earlier type stars (e.g., Su et al 2006; Sibthorpe et al 2018). FIR surveys of nearby stars show that debris disc luminosities decrease with age in a manner explained by population models in which all stars are born with a debris belt that is depleted by collisions amongst the planetesimals (Wyatt et al 2007; Gáspár et al 2013).

Reassessing the BPMG sample of F stars
Stellar multiplicity
Planetary companions
Stars with IR excess
Notes for particular targets
IR excess in multiple systems
DISC IMAGING
ALMA reduction procedure
A newly resolved disc around HD 164249
Gas emission
Previously resolved discs
Scattered light and MIR observations
HD191089
Ratio of spatially resolved disc radius to blackbody radius
SED MODELLING REVISITED
Modelling approach
Fitting results
COMPARISON WITH NEARBY F STARS
Stellar population at different ages
Field stars
Other young moving groups
F8V F5V F7V F6V F8V F5V F0III F6V F6V F8 F4V F9V
Comparing the samples
Fractional luminosity versus radius
Radius distribution
Blackbody radii
Spatially resolved disc radii
Same population scenario
Modelling detection rates
Expected detection rates
Delayed stirring
Fast depletion
Two population scenario
Different star formation environments
CONCLUSIONS
DEBRIS
Collision model
The catastrophic disruption threshold
Minimum sizes of planetesimals feeding the cascade

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.