Abstract

Three-dimensional fluorescence is currently studied by methods such as parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC), fluorescence regional integration (FRI), and principal component analysis (PCA). There are also many studies combining convolutional neural networks at present, but there is no one method recognized as the most effective among the methods combining convolutional neural networks and 3D fluorescence analysis. Based on this, we took some samples from the actual environment for measuring 3D fluorescence data and obtained a batch of public datasets from the internet species. Firstly, we preprocessed the data (including two steps of PARAFAC analysis and CNN dataset generation), and then we proposed a 3D fluorescence classification method and a components fitting method based on VGG16 and VGG11 convolutional neural networks. The VGG16 network is used for the classification of 3D fluorescence data with a training accuracy of 99.6% (as same as the PCA + SVM method (99.6%)). Among the component maps fitting networks, we comprehensively compared the improved LeNet network, the improved AlexNet network, and the improved VGG11 network, and finally selected the improved VGG11 network as the component maps fitting network. In the improved VGG11 network training, we used the MSE loss function and cosine similarity to judge the merit of the model, and the MSE loss of the network training reached 4.6 × 10−4 (characterizing the variability of the training results and the actual results), and we used the cosine similarity as the accuracy criterion, and the cosine similarity of the training results reached 0.99 (comparison of the training results and the actual results). The network performance is excellent. The experiments demonstrate that the convolutional neural network has a great application in 3D fluorescence analysis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call