Abstract
Abstract Objective: The current study aims to assess the relationship among scores on the test of memory malingering (TOMM) and general demographics (age, education, ethnicity, and gender) as well as military-specific variables (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), number of deployments, and blasts) using a large military sample. Method: An archival dataset (https://osf.io/rv9cj/), representative of the military personnel according to the Marine Corps Demographics Update (2015) consisting of 875 participants between 18-62 years, predominately male and caucasian was analyzed. Participants were referred by their medical provider for psychological and/or neurological complaints and completed a neuropsychological evaluation comprised of a clinical interview and a neuropsychological blast battery consisting of demographics and 15 tests, including the TOMM. Pre-morbid information was gathered using the ASVAB which has the following subscales: armed forces qualification test, general technical, mechanical maintenance, clerical, and electronics. Results: A decrease in TOMM Trial 2 scores was significantly associated with an increase in age r(732) = -.09, p = .014, education r(717) = -.10, p = .008, mechanical maintenance, r(330) = .12, p =.04; clerical, r(313) = .11, p =.04; and electronics r(328) = .13, p =.02. TOMM Trail 2 scores were not significantly associated with other variables. Conclusions: The findings show a weak relationship between TOMM Trial 2 and age, education, and a few subscales of ASVAB. This suggests that both demographic and vocational abilities appear to be potential mediating variables in understanding the role of effort in interpreting neuropsychological performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.