Abstract

In this note we propose a two-spine decomposition of the critical Galton-Watson tree and use this decomposition to give a probabilistic proof of Yaglom’s theorem.

Highlights

  • Consider a critical Galton-Watson process (Zn)n≥0 with Z0 = 1 and offspring distribution μ on N0 := {0, 1, . . . } which has mean 1 and finite variance σ2 > 0, i.e., (1.1)

  • We propose a k(k − 1)-type size-biased μ-Galton-Watson tree equipped with a two-spine skeleton, which serves as a change-of-measure of the original μ-Galton-Watson tree; and with the help of this two-spine technique, we give a new probabilistic proof of Theorem 1.1(2), i.e. Yaglom’s theorem

  • In our follow-up paper [8], we show that, in a similar spirit, a two-spine structure can be constructed for a class of critical superprocesses, and a probabilistic proof of a Yaglom type theorem can be obtained for those processes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In our follow-up paper [8], we show that, in a similar spirit, a two-spine structure can be constructed for a class of critical superprocesses, and a probabilistic proof of a Yaglom type theorem can be obtained for those processes Another aspect of our new proof is that we take advantage of a fact that the exponential distribution can be characterized by a particular x2-type size-biased distributional equation. In [7], Lyons, Pemantle and Peres characterize the exponential distribution by a different but well-known x-type size-biased distributional equation: A nonnegative random variable Y with positive finite mean is exponentially distributed if and only if it satisfies that (1.9). A similar type of argument is used in our follow-up paper [8] for critical superprocesses

Trees and their decompositions
Proofs
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.