Abstract
Abstract Objective The Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) is an integrated neuropsychological battery for assessing cognitive skills in adults. The current study utilizes performance validity tests (PVTs) to interpret poor effort for scores on the NAB. Method Sample consisted of 306 adult civil litigants referred for a neuropsychological evaluation aged 18 to 85 years with a mean age of 43 years. Education ranged from 8 to 20 years with a mean of 14 years of education. Poor effort was denoted by “failing” 2 or more PVTs versus individuals who did not fail any PVTs (“pass”). Results Independent-samples t-tests were run to determine if there were differences in NAB Memory Module scores between the “pass” and “fail” groups. Multiple scores on NAB Memory Module yielded statistically significant differences. Scores were then used in subsequent ROC curve analyses to determine appropriate cutoff scores with an intent to maximally balance sensitivity and specificity. ROC curve analyses were favorable (i.e., AUC > 0.70) and yielded cut scores for List Learning A Immediate Recall (≤ 18), List Learning A Short Delayed Recall (≤ 6), List Learning A Long Delayed Recall (≤ 4), Shape Learning Immediate Recognition (≤ 15), Daily Living Memory Immediate Recall (≤ 39), Daily Living Memory Delayed Recall (≤ 11), List Learning A Discriminability (≤ 7), and Name/Address/Phone Delayed Recall (≤ 4) with sensitivity values ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 and specificity values ranging from 0.70 to 0.84. Conclusion Results provide preliminary evidence of suggested cutoffs to identify suspected poor effort for various scores in the NAB Memory Module.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.