Abstract

Abstract Background Hemoglobin S (HbS) causes sickling disorders. In the laboratory, confirmation of HbS in patient samples with varying percentages is essential. Assessment is routinely performed using capillary electrophoresis (CE) and/or high-performance liquid chromatography. Sickle solubility (SS) exploits decreased solubility of HbS under reducing conditions and is a confirmatory test. SS is unreliable with low HbS, elevated HbF, severe anemia, erythrocytosis, hyperglobulinemia, extreme leukocytosis, hyperlipidemia, or increased serum proteins. Infant samples commonly have low percentages of HbS, high HbF, and limited sample volume. Intact globin chain Mass Spectrometry (MS) is used to identify abnormal hemoglobin variants by detecting the mass change (normal α/β/γ mass =15127/15867/15996 amu), respectively). MS has potential advantages in sensitivity and efficiency over SS and requires lower input sample volume. Herein we compare the utility of MS versus SS for confirmation of HbS. Methods Twenty-three EDTA-anticoagulated blood samples containing low percentages of HbS were identified. SS was performed on 30μL washed packed cells (requires 200μL whole blood) per standard methods. Intact Quadrupole Time-of-Flight MS (Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS 6520, Agilent Technologies, California) was performed using 10μL whole blood sample in acetonitrile solution reagent and results were compared. HbS and HbF levels were assayed by capillary electrophoresis (Sebia, France) per standard methods. Results Select results are summarized in Table 1. SS detected HbS percentages to 4.8% when HbF was low but not 6% HbS when Hb F is high. MS showed no HbF interference and identified HbS peaks (at 15837 amu) down to 3.1%. HbS percentages <3.1 were undetected by both methods. Conclusions Overall, MS was superior to SS for confirming HbS, particularly in samples with low variant percentage and/or elevated HbF. MS is also optimal when sample volume is minimal, such as for infants. Percentages of HbS <3% require methods such as IEF or DNA sequencing for confirmation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.