Abstract

Determine if a multidimensional (i.e., four-factor model) approach to post-concussion symptoms identifies more participants with persistent post-concussion symptoms after a sport-related concussion than a standard total score approach. Student-athletes (N = 1097; 61% Male; 59% White; 35% Freshmen; 14% Football athletes) from the Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education consortium completed the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-3 Symptom Evaluation six months after a concussion. Scores ≥84th percentile compared to normative data were considered elevated. Elevation rates for total and subscale scores were compared to examine the utility of a multidimensional interpretation in identifying persistent symptoms. Six months after injury, 9.9% of athletes had symptom elevations on the total or subscale score. Overall, 8.1% of athletes were elevated on a subscale (i.e., physical = 3.9%, cognitive = 1.9%, affective = 2.3%, sleep-arousal = 1.7%) but not the total score, whereas just 1.8% were elevated on both a subscale and the total score. No athletes were elevated on the total score without being concurrently elevated on a subscale. Multidimensional symptom interpretations may aid in identifying cases of persistent post-concussion symptoms, detecting up to 8.1% of athletes with elevated symptoms that would not be detected by focusing on a total score alone. This study did not assess for daily symptoms, which is one of the consensus criteria for persistent post-concussion symptoms. Future research should evaluate whether specific subscale elevations correspond to functional deficits or adverse health outcomes in these athletes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call