Abstract

Microhaplotypes are an emerging type of forensic genetic marker that are expected to support multiple forensic applications. Here, we developed a 124-plex panel for microhaplotype genotyping based on next-generation sequencing (NGS). The panel yielded intralocus and interlocus balanced sequencing data with a high percentage of effective reads. A full genotype was determined with as little as 0.1 ng of input DNA. Parallel mixture experiments and in-depth comparative analyses were performed with capillary-electrophoresis-based short tandem repeat (STR) and NGS-based microhaplotype genotyping, and demonstrated that microhaplotypes are far superior to STRs for mixture deconvolution. DNA from Han Chinese individuals (n = 256) was sequenced with the 124-plex panel. In total, 514 alleles were observed, and the forensic genetic parameters were calculated. A comparison of the forensic parameters for the 20 microhaplotypes with the top Ae values in the 124-plex panel and 20 commonly used forensic STRs showed that these microhaplotypes were as effective as STRs in identifying individuals. A linkage disequilibrium analysis showed that 106 of the 124 microhaplotypes were independently hereditary, and the combined match probability for these 106 microhaplotypes was 5.23 × 10−66. We conclude that this 124-plex microhaplotype panel is a powerful tool for forensic applications.

Highlights

  • Capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based genetic analyzers are widely used in forensic DNA laboratories, these machines are unsuitable for microhaplotype genotyping[8]

  • We have developed an next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based 124-plex panel of microhaplotypes

  • Mixture experiments showed that the microhaplotypes are superior to short tandem repeat (STR) in forensic mixture analysis because they avoid interference by stutters, and the dropout of minor contributor alleles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based genetic analyzers are widely used in forensic DNA laboratories, these machines are unsuitable for microhaplotype genotyping[8]. Single-strand conformational polymorphisms[9] and high-resolution melting curves[4] have been used for microhaplotype genotyping. These methods are simple and inexpensive, but they can pose problems when multiplexing different loci or dealing with mixed samples. Locus name mh15KK-095 mh15KK-104 mh16KK-049 mh16KK-096 mh16KK-255 mh16KK-302 mh17KK-052 mh17KK-053 mh17KK-054 mh17KK-055 mh17KK-076 mh17KK-077 mh17KK-105 mh17KK-110 mh17KK-272 mh18KK-285 mh18KK-293 mh19KK-056 mh19KK-057 mh19KK-299 mh19KK-301 mh20KK-058 mh20KK-059 mh20KK-307 mh21KK-315 mh21KK-316 mh21KK-320 mh21KK-324

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.