Abstract

BackgroundThough sepsis is common in patients with cancer, there are limited studies that evaluated sepsis and septic shock in this patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and to identify predictors of mortality in cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock.MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted at a medical-surgical oncologic ICU of a comprehensive cancer center. Adult cancer patients admitted with septic shock between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2019 were enrolled. Septic shock was defined as an ICU admission diagnosis of sepsis that required initiating vasopressors within 24 h of admission. Patient baseline characteristics, ICU length of stay and ICU and hospital mortality were recorded. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed to identify predictors associated with ICU and hospital mortality.ResultsDuring the study period, 1408 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 56.8 ± 16.1 (SD) years and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II was 23.0 ± 7.91 (SD). Among the enrolled patients, 67.8% had solid tumors while the remaining had hematological malignancies. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 19.3 and 39.5% of the patients, respectively, and mechanical ventilation was required for 42% of the patients. Positive cultures were reported in 836 (59.4%) patients, most commonly blood (33%) and respiratory (26.6%). Upon admission, about half the patients had acute kidney injury, while elevated total bilirubin and lactic acid levels were reported in 13.8 and 65.2% of the patients, respectively. The median ICU length of stay was 4 days (IQR 3–8), and ICU and hospital mortality were reported in 688 (48.9%) and 914 (64.9%) patients, respectively. Mechanical ventilation, APACHE II, thrombocytopenia, positive cultures, elevated bilirubin and lactic acid levels were significantly associated with both ICU and hospital mortality.ConclusionsIn a relatively large cohort of patients with solid and hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU with septic shock, hospital mortality was reported in about two-third of the patients. Mechanical ventilation, APACHE II, thrombocytopenia, positive cultures, elevated bilirubin and lactic acid levels were significant predictors of mortality.

Highlights

  • Though sepsis is common in patients with cancer, there are limited studies that evaluated sepsis and septic shock in this patient population

  • In this report, we described the outcomes of a large cohort of patients with solid and hematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock

  • Though the mortality rate reported in this study may be comparable to the outcomes reported by others for cancer patients with septic shock [16, 19], the high mortality rate highlights the importance of identifying measures to improve the outcomes in cancer patients with septic shock as well as developing prediction models to help in the early identification of patients with poor prognosis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Though sepsis is common in patients with cancer, there are limited studies that evaluated sepsis and septic shock in this patient population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and to identify predictors of mortality in cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock. Sepsis is a common complication in cancer patients due to the immune-suppression associated with the underlying malignancy and the various cancer-related therapies [1]. In critically ill patients with cancer, sepsis was among the most common admission diagnosis to the intensive care units (ICUs) [3,4,5]. Though the outcomes of critically ill cancer patients have improved over the years, studies continue to report a higher mortality in cancer patients with sepsis, compared to non-cancer patients [2, 6,7,8,9,10,11]. The underlying circulatory, metabolic, and cellular abnormalities in septic shock are associated with high hospital mortality, approaching 40–60% [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call