Abstract
Introduction: One reason athletes train their trunk muscles is that the body's trunk stability has been shown to prevent injury. However, the relationship between body trunk muscle thickness, particularly that of deep muscles, and athletic performance remains to be clarified.Purpose: We aimed to explore the relationship between 100-m sprint performance and the sizes of the trunk stabilizing muscles, the psoas major muscle (PM), transversus abdominis (TA), and multifidus muscle (MM), in collegiate sprinters.Methods: Fourteen male sprinters belonging to a university athletics club participated in this study. The thicknesses of the TA and MM were measured using an ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus (ProSound C3; Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). The cross-sectional area of the PM was assessed by a magnetic resonance imaging apparatus (Vantage Elan; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). The relationship between these anthropometric parameters and the 100-m sprint time was analyzed by Spearman's correlation coefficient, multi- regression analysis, and the change-point regression model.Results: The sizes (mean ± SD) of the muscles were: PM, 43.074 ± 7.35 cm2; TA, 4.36 ± 0.72 mm; and MM, 3.99 ± 0.48 cm. The mean 100-m sprint time was 11.00 ± 0.48 s. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed that the 100-m sprint time had a significant moderate negative correlation with TA (ρ = −0.691, p < 0.01) and a low negative but not significant correlation with MM (ρ = −0.327, p = 0.28), whereas PM did not show a significant or in-negligible correlation. The change-point regression model found the change-points in the 100-m sprint time and the thickness of the TA and MM at 4.70 mm (95% CI: 4.00–5.43 mm) and 3.84 cm (95% CI: 3.28–4.31 cm), respectively. The sprint time decreased with an increase in the thickness of the muscles up to the change-points, whereas it did not change even if the muscles became thicker than the change-points. The change-points were consistently observed when the thickness of the muscles was normalized by body mass.Conclusion: Sprint performance for 100-m was found to be associated with TA and MM thickness in a biphasic manner. As muscle thickness increased, the sprint time decreased, followed by a plateau phase.
Highlights
One reason athletes train their trunk muscles is that the body’s trunk stability has been shown to prevent injury
In this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between 100-m sprint performance and the cross-sectional area of psoas major muscle (PM) and muscle thicknesses of the transversus abdominis (TA) and multifidus muscle (MM) associated with trunk stability in collegiate sprinters
This study aimed to explore the relationship between the 100m sprint time and the morphology of the deep trunk muscles in collegiate athletes
Summary
One reason athletes train their trunk muscles is that the body’s trunk stability has been shown to prevent injury. The relationship between body trunk muscle thickness, that of deep muscles, and athletic performance remains to be clarified. Purpose: We aimed to explore the relationship between 100-m sprint performance and the sizes of the trunk stabilizing muscles, the psoas major muscle (PM), transversus abdominis (TA), and multifidus muscle (MM), in collegiate sprinters. The deep trunk muscles, including the transversus abdominis (TA) and multifidus muscle (MM), are involved in the stability of the trunk and are activated prior to the movement of the limbs (Hodges and Richardson, 1997a) in order to support the limb’s power during motor chain activity (Butcher et al, 2007; Jamison et al, 2012). Deep trunk muscles provide a fundamental basis for the strength of the extremities, by acting in advance of other muscles, and affect sports performance
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
