Abstract

BackgroundData on the efficacy and safety of all targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) including sunitinib are collected in the Czech RENIS patient registry. RENIS thus provides a uniquely large sample of long-term effectiveness and prognostic data of sunitinib according to adverse/risk factors measured by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) score. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of sunitinib, when used as 1st line treatment, based on MSKCC risk group scores including MSKCC scores for two intermediate subgroups. MethodsData from mRCC patients treated using sunitinib in the 1st line were collected in RENIS between 06/2007 and 02/2018. OS/PFS were then stratified based on MSKCC scores: a) favorable risk (0 adverse factors (AF)), b) intermediate risk (pooled 1–2 AFs), and c) poor risk (3+ AFs). The OS/PFS of the intermediate risk group was further stratified into two subgroups: i) 1AF and ii) 2 AFs. All OS/PFS data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Differences in OS/PFS between risk groups were assessed using median survival, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the log-rank test. Then we assessed the OS/PFS for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. ResultsOver the 11-year follow-up, 2390 patients were treated using sunitinib with 806, 1450, and 134 patients in the favorable, intermediate, and poor MSKCC risk groups. The more favorable MSKCC risk group was accompanied by an improved OS and PFS (p<0.001). Regarding the MSKCC for the two intermediate sub-groups, 1AF was associated with improved survival compared to 2 AFs (p<0.001) (Table).Table957P OS and PFS results for sunitinib treatment based on MSKCC risk groupsTableMSKCC favorableMSKCC intermediateMSKCC poorMSKCC intermediateAll patients1AF2 AFsOverall survivalMedian survival (95% CI)44.7months (40.9-50.5)24.1months (21.9-26.0)9.5months (7.2-14.1)28.2months (25.9-30.7)16.2months (14.5-20.2)28.5months (26.3-30.5)1-year survival (95% CI)85.0% (82.4-87.6)69.1% (66.6-71.7)44.3% (35.0-53.7)74.3% (71.4-77.2)58.0% (53.1-62.9)73.3% (71.4-75.2)3-year survival (95 %CI)57.3% (53.4-61.3)37.1% (34.1-40.1)9.6% (3.1-16.2)42.0% (38.3-45.7)26.3% (21.4-31.2)42.9% (40.5-45.2)5-year survival (95% CI)35.6% (31.2-40.1)23.4% (20.4-26.4)3.2% (0.0-8.8)26.5% (22.7-30.3)16.5% (11.8-21.2)26.8% (24.3-29.2)n80614501349694812390Log-rank p-value< 0.001< 0.001-Progression-free survivalMedian survival (95% CI)17.0months (15.4-18.8)9.0months (8.3-9.5)4.5months (3.9-6.1)10.1months (9.4-11.4)6.2months (5.5-7.5)10.6months (9.9-11.5)1-year survival (95% CI)61.8% (58.3-65.3)40.7% (38.0-43.4)20.8% (13.1-28.5)45.1% (41.8-48.4)31.6% (27.1-36.1)46.9% (44.7-49.0)3-year survival (95 %CI)25.1% (21.7-28.5)13.0% (11.0-15.1)1.8% (0.0-5.1)15.9% (13.2-18.6)7.0% (4.2-9.7)16.6% (14.9-18.4)5-year survival (95% CI)10.4% (7.7-13.2)8.0% (6.2-9.8)1.8% (0.0-5.1)9.7 (7.3-12.0)4.5% (2.1-6.9)8.4% (7.0-9.9)n80614501349694812390Log-rank p-value< 0.001< 0.001- ConclusionsBetter MSKCC risk scores were associated with significantly longer OS and PFS. To our knowledge, this is the largest published sunitinib mRCC cohort described relative to MSKCC risk groups. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureJ. Finek: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Teva; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre. A. Poprach: Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Bayer. B. Melichar: Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Bayer. J. Kopecky: Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer. M. Zemanova: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim. T. Buchler: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen. K. Kopeckova: Honoraria (self): Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer. T. Mlcoch: Full / Part-time employment: Value Outcomes. T. Dolezal: Full / Part-time employment: Value Outcomes. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.