Abstract

Unsupported catalysts have received considerable attention for coal liquefaction. These catalysts have been introduced into coal liquefaction systems by impregnation of the coal, as water-soluble salts, as volatile metal carbonyls, as oil-soluble organometallics, as finely divided powders, and as mineral matter associated with the coal and/or solvent. For the most part, the method of catalyst precursor addition affected the observed catalyst performance. Weller et al. found that, with ammonium heptamolybdate, coal impregnation resulted in higher coal conversions than physical mixing of the powder with coal. Others have also observed this result. Additionally, Derbyshire et al. found that the conditions used to dry the impregnated coal (removing the aqueous solvent used for solubilizing the catalyst precursor) affected the activity of the molybdenum. Joseph and Artok et al. reported that expanding the coal structure (by swelling during impregnation) improved the observed activity of the catalyst, possibly by allowing better contacting of the coal with the catalyst. Schlesinger et al. found that results approaching those of impregnated MOS{sub 2} could be obtained by thoroughly mixing a powdered catalyst with the coal using a ball-mill.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.