Abstract
Objective: Evidence-based preventive care services are crucial for people with diabetes to improve their health outcomes, but the utilization of the services among older adults is suboptimal. Our objective is to compare relative performance of the Diabetes Belt and surrounding counties in the uptake of preventive services among Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes given available health care resources in the counties. The Diabetes Belt includes 644 counties in the Appalachian and deep south areas of the US that have high diabetes prevalence. Methods: We used data envelopment analysis (DEA) to compute technical efficiency of counties for 2009-2015. Technical efficiency measures how many outputs a decision-making unit produces given a set of inputs. Inputs included the number of physicians and nurses per 1000 adults in the counties, and outputs included the number of foot exams, a1c tests, and microalbumin tests per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes. The Diabetes Belt includes counties in the Appalachian and deep south areas of the US that have high diabetes prevalence. We performed t-tests to compare efficiency between the Diabetes Belt and surrounding counties. We excluded counties with 0 doctors or 0 nurses for >1 year in 2009-2015. Results: Of 1057 counties, 861 (496 in the Belt and 365 in surrounding areas) were included. During the study period, the average technical efficiency of the counties ranged from 79% to 83%, with only 2.- 3.4% of counties achieving 100% technical efficiency. Diabetes Belt counties had consistently lower efficiency than surrounding counties during the study period (p <0.05) . The mean efficiency was 78-81% in the Diabetes Belt and 81-85% in the surrounding counties. Discussion: Our results suggest that the degree of inefficiencies was higher in the Diabetes Belt compared to surrounding counties. Given relatively low available resources in these areas, more attention to improve diabetes preventive care is needed. Disclosure H.Kang: None. S.Kim: None. J.M.Lobo: n/a. M.Sohn: None. Funding National Institutes of Health (1R01DK113295-01A1)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.