Abstract

Purpose of study: The modified Scoliosis Research Society (MSRS) outcomes instrument (SRS-22) had been validated as an outcomes tool for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. There is no validated disease-specific outcomes instrument for adult scoliosis. The purpose of this paper is to determine the reliability and validity of the modified Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire for adults with scoliosis.Methods used: Reliability of the modified SRS instrument in adults was tested using Cronbach's alpha test of internal consistency and calculation of test-retest parity. The validity of the modified SRS instrument in adults was determined by criterion validity in the domains of pain, function, self-image, and mental health compared with matched domains in the Short Form (SF)-36.of findings: A total of 146 adults with scoliosis were included (133 female and 13 male). The average age was 47.1 years (range, 18 to 86 years). Cronbach's alpha analysis of internal consistency within each domain demonstrates intercorrelation values (μ) greater than 0.75 for each domain of the MSRS. Pearson correlation coefficients with comparable domains within the SF-36 demonstrate high correlation in domains representing pain (r=0.8), function (r=0.85), mental health (r=0.89) and self-image (r=0.63). Total score correlates highly with every domain of the SF-36 (r=0.6 to 0.8). Test-retest analysis in 36 patients who completed questionnaires at both time points demonstrated high correlations for each domain (r=0.83 to 0.94). A floor effect was seen in less than 2% of patients in each domain of the MSRS. A ceiling effect was seen in less than 10% of patients in each domain of the MSRS.Relationship between findings and existing knowledge: Adult spinal deformity is significantly different from adolescent deformity in that affected patients characteristically present with pain and limitation of function. The MSRS questionnaire is a reliable instrument in adults, as demonstrated by a high degree of internal consistency and reproducibility. In adults with scoliosis, the MSRS questionnaire correlated highly with the SF-36 standard. In adolescent deformity, the purpose of surgical intervention is usually to prevent future consequences of progressive deformity. Therefore, the MSRS instrument may underestimate the value of surgery to the adolescent. The application of a disease-specific outcomes instrument to adults with deformity will permit standardization of outcomes assessment in adult deformity surgery.Overall significance of findings: The MSRS is a valid, reliable and reproducible outcomes instrument for adult deformity. This study supports the use of the MSRS questionnaire in the adult spinal deformity population.Disclosures: No disclosure.Conflict of interest: No conflicts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call