Abstract
Abstract Introduction A recent publication in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery journal (Rohrich et al., 2020) has attracted controversy for its generalised approach to “millennial” plastic surgeons. We suggest that surgeons in training, trainers and colleagues need to adjust their focus from the group to the individual in order to maximise clinical performance, quality of working life and quality of care delivered to patients. Method We outline a simple model, adapted from the Johari window tool, with the aim of delivering a job and training plan with which all parties are content. It considers individual ability to process scenarios and perform tasks (bandwidth), and the resources available to the individual trainee, to assess each aspect of the role. Results No two clinicians have the same strengths and weaknesses, and no two posts are identical. The Johari-like matrix allows trainers and trainees to identify which activities are firmly within the bandwidth and resources of the trainee, those which are clearly not, and those which may cause some concern and require further discussion or modification. Conclusions In this model, we suggest a framework which may help surgeons in training and trainers alike and provide a means of recording this longitudinally as individuals or roles evolve.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.