8740 Visceral Adipose Tissue Assessment in Patients With Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: J. Saini: None. C.D. Zhang: None. V. Fell: None. E. Atkinson: None. S. Achenbach: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Several studies employing computed tomography (CT) scans for body composition measurements have reported lower muscle mass and a higher proportion of visceral fat in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) compared to referent subjects. While a CT scan assesses visceral adipose tissue (VAT) at a single slice level (L3), no studies have evaluated the overall VAT in patients with MACS using Dual-Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Objective: To determine the impact of MACS on VAT using DXA scan as compared to referent subjects. Methods: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional study of adults with 75 MACS and 75 referent subjects. MACS was defined as serum cortisol>1.8 mcg/dL after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test in patients with adrenal adenomas and no features of overt hypercortisolism. Referent subjects were included if they had abdominal imaging and had no adrenal disorders. All the participants underwent a full body DXA scan between 04/2019 and 07/2022. We applied the CoreScan software to estimate the (1) total lean and fat mass (2) visceral fat mass and volume (3) lean android, fat android, and android mass, and compared measurements of patients and referent subjects using linear regression models adjusted for sex and BMI. Results: A total of 75 patients with MACS (median age 57.0 years, IQR 47.8-65.6, 67% women) and 75 referent subjects (median age 57.6 years, IQR 49.1-65.8, 67% women) were included. Patients had a higher BMI compared to referent subjects (median 31.7 kg/m2, IQR 27.4-37.9 vs 28.7, IQR, 25.4-33.8, P=0.004). The median post-DST cortisol in patients was 3.1 mcg/dL (IQR, 2.2-5.2). When compared to referent subjects, and after adjustment for sex and BMI, patients had a similar total body fat (estimate=846, p-value=0.28) and lean mass (estimate=-201, p-value=0.83), similar android fat mass (estimate=59, p-value=0.64) but lower gynoid fat mass (estimate=400, 0.007). Notably, sex and BMI-adjusted analysis also showed that patients had a higher VAT fat mass (estimate= -225, p-value=0.084) and a higher VAT fat mass/total mass ratio (estimate= -0.007, p-value=0.026). Conclusions: When adjusted for BMI and sex, patients with MACS do not demonstrate differences in overall fat and lean mass. However, we showed that MACS is associated with increased visceral adiposity, a known cardiovascular risk factor. Body composition assessment by DXA could be a safer and less expensive alternative in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with MACS. Presentation: 6/2/2024