870 COMBINING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AND TRASCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURES: THE IMPORTANCE OF INTRAVASCULAR LITHOTRIPSY

Abstract

Abstract Background Calcified coronary artery disease and severe valvular aortic stenosis (AS) often coexist. For instance, severely calcified lesions may strongly influence the revascularization strategy in patients undergoing transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Shock wave intravascular lithotripsy (S-IVL) (Shockwave Medical Inc. Santa Clara, CA) is the only technology available that cracks both medial and intimal calcium while minimizing trauma to the vessel wall, thus allowing a safe plaque debulking. We report a case of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and TAVR in the same procedure, where S-IVL has been used to treat a heavily calcified lesion and optimize stent under-expansion. Case Report A 79 years-old male patient with a history of diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, and peripheral artery disease, was admitted to our institution with symptomatic severe AS and severe calcified left anterior descending (LAD) artery lesion at CT scan. Deemed eligible for TAVR, Heart Team planned a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of LAD and TAVR in the same procedure. Through the left radial artery, coronary angiography confirmed 90% stenosis of the LAD at the central segment. Accordingly, pre-dilatation of the stenosis was performed with a 2.5×12 mm non-compliant balloon (NCB) and, because of the severe calcification, S-IVL with a 3.0×12 mm balloon inflated at 4-6 Atmospheres (ATM), delivering 40 pulses. Following, a 3.5×18-mm drug-eluting stent was implanted at 18 ATM. After implantation, an inadequate expansion of the stents was observed, which persisted despite post-dilation with 3.75×8 mm NCB at high-pressure. Bail-out S-IVL was then performed with the 3.0×12 mm balloon inflated at 4-6 ATM, delivering 40 pulses in-stent, followed by a further stent post-dilated with a 3.75×8 mm NCB up to 20 ATM. The final angiogram showed a satisfactory stent expansion. Since the low contrast volume was used, we decided to go ahead with transfemoral TAVR. Therefore, through the left femoral artery access, a 34-mm self-expandable Evolut R valve was implanted. Transthoracic echocardiography showed optimal valve implantation with a trivial periprosthetic leak. No complications were observed after the procedures and the patient was discharged after 6 days with 6 months of mandated dual antiplatelet therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel). Discussion In this case, the bail-out use of S-IVL was essential for an optima stent implantation, allowing TAVR procedure and avoiding prolonged theoretical antithrombotic therapy underlying suboptimal stent implantation. Despite encouraging initial results, future large studies with long-term observation are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of S-IVL in this scenario.