860 Distal Radius Fracture Management in A DGH Do the Guidelines Fit?

Abstract

Abstract Aim Distal radial fractures are common injuries within adults at a variety of ages. The best treatment option remains a debated subject. The BOAST guidelines aim to guide the initial management of these fractures in the emergency department we audited against these guidelines in a local district general hospital. Method A retrospective audit was performed of adult patients with distal radius fractures who attended in December 2019, at a local district General Hospital. Patients were identified by using the Orthopaedic Take lists. Notes were reviewed for patient demographics, quality of documentation of neurovascular status, documentation of fracture information, including further management. Results There were 16 cases identified, 87.5% were female with mean age of 63 with over 56 % in the over 65s category. Only 19% of cases had appropriately documented neurovascular status. 57% were lacking specific documentation of each nerve as per BOAST guidelines, as well as 57% had no documentation of radial pulse. With regards to reductions undertaken in ED only 44% were documented if reduction took place. Of the reductions that were documented 66% documented type of analgesia used. 17% used regional anaesthesia as preferred in BOAST guidelines. Conclusions Overall compliance with BOAST guidelines was poor. Several areas to improve were seen, for which the recent launch of a new in-house smartphone application is aimed to improve access to BOAST guidelines. There was great difficulty in achieving the BOAST guidance with regards to the use of regional anaesthesia, nationally most A&E departments reduce these fractures under a haematoma block.