84. T2Candida Panel Use Evaluation: a Quality Improvement Project

Abstract

BackgroundInvasive candidiasis is a life-threatening infection with 40% mortality despite antifungal therapy[1] A retrospective chart review of results from our T2Candida Panels from March 2019 to March 2020 was conducted. We compared demographics, co-morbidities, days of antifungal use, length of stay (LOS) and mortality in patients with positive and negative assays.Results271 assays were performed, 27 were positive and were compared to 81 negatives. Baseline demographics and co-morbidities were similar in both groups. All patients tested had >1 risk factor for candidemia.78% were positive for C. albicans/C. tropicalis and 11% positive for C. glabrata/C. krusei and C. parapsilosis respectively. Blood cultures were positive in 8 individuals, of which 5 had a positive assay; among the other 3, one grew C. auris. All species in the T2Candida matched the blood cultures when available.β-D-glucan was positive in 82% of patients with positive T2 results vs 46% in the T2 negative group (p = 0.016).Antifungal administration within the time of assay collection was 54% in the negative group vs 74% in the positive group (p = 0.030). Mean duration of antifungal use were significantly lower in the negative group than the positive group (5.98 vs 17.55 days, p = 0.04).Demographics and Comorbidities Outcomes Cultures ConclusionT2Candida was an effective diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship tool, leading to testing in high risk patients and reducing unnecessary antifungal use. Additional education is required for improved ordering of concurrent blood cultures. Negative results should be interpreted with caution in suspected invasive candidiasis with consideration for species not included in the panel.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures