816 Comparing Match Data for Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery Applicants From 2016-2022: Is There a Point of Diminishing Return for Research Experiences and Publications?

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The application process for neurological surgery (NSGY) and orthopaedic surgery (Ortho) residency positions is highly competitive. Prior work has characterized variables associated with improved match rates; however, limited analyses have been published in recent years. METHODS: Data on the characteristics of NSGY and Ortho applicants was obtained from the National Residency Matching Program Interactive Charting Outcomes in the Match tool from 2016 to 2022. The POM was computed for each subgroup classification available for applicant characteristics. RESULTS: Applicant characteristics that correlated with an improved POM into both NSGY and Ortho included increasing USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores, being a US MD Senior, number (#) of contiguous ranks (a proxy for # of interviews), # of volunteer experiences, and being a member of AOA. An increasing # of publications correlated with an increased POM until 25+ were reported for NSGY applicants but only until more than 11-15 were reported for Ortho applicants. A PhD correlated positively with the POM for NSGY applicants but negatively for Ortho applicants. Non-PhD graduate degrees correlated negatively with the POM for both NSGY and Ortho applicants. An increasing # of work experiences correlated negatively with the POM for NSGY applicants at all levels, and correlated negatively with the POM for Ortho applicants after 3-5 were reported. CONCLUSIONS: There appeared to be a point of diminishing return where an increasing number of publications no longer increased the probability of matching for both NSGY and Ortho applicants. Non-PhD graduate degrees did not improve the POM. Ranking more programs was associated with a higher POM for both NSGY and Ortho applicants, suggesting an incentive to take as many interviews as possible if not otherwise restricted.