811 Comparison of an Enzymatic Debrider with Antibiotic Ointment in the Outpatient Care of Minor Partial Thickness Burns

Abstract

Abstract Introduction In the U.S. about 450,000 people per year receive medical burn care through hospital emergency departments, hospital outpatient clinics, free-standing urgent care centers and private physician offices. Burns are generally classified in terms of depth and severity. Outpatient management of partial thickness burns normally involves the application of an ointment, which may contain an antibiotic and is widely used in burn care. This clinical study has been designed to prospectively evaluate potential benefits of an enzymatic debrider in partial thickness burn wounds compared to antibiotic only treatment. The primary purpose of this study is to compare an enzymatic debrider with a topical antibiotic ointment in the proportion healed at 3 weeks after initiation of treatment, and time to healing (in weeks). Methods A convenience sample of 20 subjects, aged 19–56, with an acute thermal burn injury less than 72 hours old, and less than 10% TBSA were randomly assigned to outpatient treatment with an enzymatic debrider or a topical antibiotic. The proportion of subjects healed after 3 weeks of treatment was analyzed using ANOVA. In addition, a t-test comparison between the enzymatic debrider and the topical antibiotic was performed. Results For partial thickness burns, the mean time to heal using an enzymatic debrider was 18 days compared to 28 days for the topical antibiotic. However, there was no statistical significance in burn wound closure between subjects receiving an enzymatic debrider compared to a topical antibiotic, t (13) = .677; p = .510. An analysis of variance comparing an enzymatic debrider and a topical antibiotic also showed no statistical significance in time to heal (F=.849, p=374). Conclusions Due to the small sample size, the results from this study do not support the use of an enzymatic debrider versus a topical antibiotic in treating partial thickness burn injuries to advance wound closure or shorten time to heal. The results of this study show clinical significance, with burn wounds healed in 18 days when an enzymatic debrider was used compared to 28 days when a topical antibiotic was used. The lack of statistical significance was due to an under-powered study. Furthermore, partial thickness burns should spontaneously heal within 7–14 days, regardless of the topical treatment, excluding concomitant co-morbidities. Applicability of Research to Practice Continued research is necessary, employing larger sample sizes to adequately compare the use of an enzymatic debrider compared to topical antibiotics in deep partial thickness burn wounds. In addition, outpatient management of deep thickness and full-thickness burn injuries, utilizing sharp debridement in conjunction with enzymatic debridement, in patients who decline surgical treatment of burn wounds should be explored, analyzing time to heal, scar evaluation, and cost analysis,