Abstract

Abstract To compare reproducibility of repeated measurements of oesophageal motility metrics after 5 wet swallows within a study. Methods Patients referred for high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) to assess oesophageal motor function were enrolled. Solid-state 36-channel 10 Fr catheter (Unisensor AG) and Solar (MMS) software were used. Minimum 10 water swallows by 5 mL each were obtained. Two operators independently assessed the results of examination. Records of swallows were divided into 2 series by 5 measurements each. These series were compared by key metrics: integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), distal contractile integral (DCI), distal latency (DL), and contractile front velocity (CFV). Non-parametric statistics was used to compare the results. Results We enrolled 46 men and 68 women, age (mean ± SD) 48.8 ± 11.5 y.o. Of them, 52 patients had GERD, 25-different types of achalasia and 37 had no oesophageal disorders. The inter-observer agreement between 2 series of measurements reached 98%. No significant difference was found between the mean results of IRP, DCI, DL and CFV in 2 series of measurements (table 1). Conclusion No significant differences between studied HREM metrics in two series of measurements were found. The results of two series by 5 measurements within a study are reproducible. This may indicate the possibility of reducing the standard number of measurements. Reduction of time necessary for standard examination may allow additional time for functional tests (solid food swallows, RDC or MRS).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call