Abstract

Objective To investigate whether statistical models of nerve excitability study (NES) parameters are able to distinguish between motor disorders with overlapping clinical features. Methods 81 motor NES in median nerve were undertaken in patients (55 males, mean age: 55.9 ± 13.1) with clinically diagnosed motor neuron disease (MND; N = 25), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP; N = 32), multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN; N = 13) and Kennedy’s disease (KD; N = 11). Multinomial regression models were built using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) method to balance model complexity with goodness of fit and likelihood ratio tests to identify which NES output variables make the best predictive model. Results The final model was able to predict a patient’s diagnosis of MND (sensitivity 68%, specificity 87%), CIDP (sensitivity 77%, specificity 82%), MMN (sensitivity 88%, specificity 94%) and KD (sensitivity 41%, specificity 96%) incorporating the NES output variables of TEd undershoot, superexcitability (7 ms), subexcitability, stimulus threshold, latency and gender. Conclusions Motor NES profiles differ between motor disorders, enabling statistical modelling to separate different groups of patients with motor disorders. Significance Statistical modelling of NES data may aid clinicians in the differential diagnosis of motor disorders.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call