Abstract

Abstract Aim The optimal excision margin for Lentigo Maligna (LM) lesions has been a frequent topic of debate. An audit was carried out to compare the excision margins used for LM excisions with current NICE guidelines, and to assess the adequacy of these excision margins. Method A retrospective study was carried out to analyse all excisions of LM lesions in 2018. 33 patients were identified from the plastic surgery departmental database. Patient demographics, the site and distribution of LM lesions, and any history of previous skin cancer were analysed. Patient electronic records, operative notes, and histopathological reports were examined to determine the number of excisions done for each LM lesion along with the peripheral and deep surgical excision margins, and the histological clearance achieved. Complete histological clearance was determined by the Multidisciplinary team for each lesion. Results 60 cases were identified. 60% of cases were located on the head and neck. The average peripheral surgical excision margin at first excision was 2.3mm. 55% of patients had a 2nd excision. The average peripheral surgical excision margin at 2nd excision was 5.4mm. 70.6% of cases achieved complete histological clearance at 2nd excision. 72.7% of lesions excised at 2nd excision with a 5mm or less surgical excision margin achieved complete histological clearance. Conclusions Taking >5mm surgical excision margins did not increase the rate of complete histological clearance for Lentigo Maligna lesions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call