Abstract

Abstract Aim Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has revolutionised the treatment of skin cancer. It is commonly considered as gold standard, with good cosmesis effect for patients. Patient perception plays an important outcome in skin cancers. This systematic review aims to explore evidence of post-operative patient reported satisfaction after MMS. Method We conducted a systematic search using 10 databases including OVID Medline(R), Pubmed, Cochrane (CENTRAL) of all study types between 2000–2021. Studies were appraised for bias and data was tabulated with a narrative synthesis. Results The literature search generated 1068 studies. After removing duplicates, 728 were screened and 37 underwent full-text review. Thirteen relevant studies comprising 3046 patients undergoing MMS were included. Patients undergoing MMS expressed higher anxiety pre-operatively compared to conventional excision surgery but post-operatively Mohs was associated with a significantly higher skin cancer index (SCI) score. This was both in the short- and long-term follow up. Patients showed overall very high satisfaction with the technical quality, irrespective of reconstructive complexity or the surgeon's expertise. Patients’ main concerns post-operatively included scar skin thickness, colour, and irregularity. Higher satisfaction was observed in those with better pre-operative quality of life (QOL) including skin quality, co-morbidities, mental health, and age. Conclusion Overall patient satisfaction after MMS is high and supports transition to this surgical technique within skin cancer surgery. Higher satisfaction rates are observed in patients with better pre-operative QOL. Post-operatively patients are most concerned of scar thickness, colour, and irregularity. These factors should guide surgeons’ decision-making when aiming to maximise patient satisfaction.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.