7784 Perspectives Of Anabolic Steroid Users On Steroid Use, Side Effects, And Patient Education

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: D.D. Lam: None. M. Potemkin: None. J. Kreutz: None. H. Shah: None. P. Patel: None. P.K. Doyle-Baker: None. Background: Details on first-hand perceived and experienced effects of anabolic steroids (AS) on users are sparse. Furthermore, there is limited information on what type of AS knowledge users possess, irrespective of current published works in AS pharmacology. This study aimed to identify insights of AS users regarding their knowledge and patterns of AS use, commonly experienced side effects, sources used for steroid education, and their unique needs as a population. Study Design: AS users from Calgary, Alberta, Canada of various sexes and ages ≥ 18 were recruited through gyms in Alberta with convenience and snowball sampling techniques. Participant-centered-qualitative research using semi-structured interviews was conducted. Participants discussed their experiences as a user and shared their understanding of AS, details of usage including compounds used, and their commonly experienced or perceived side effects through one-on-one interviews of varying durations. Interviews were coded using NVivo 14 Software prior to thematic analysis. Resulting codes were organized into overarching themes based on researchers' consensus. Results: Seven AS users were confidentially interviewed over Zoom. Several important themes emerged. There existed a wide variety of AS that users have identified, with some of the most commonly mentioned being Anavar, Nolvadex, Testosterone, and Trenbolone. Steroid users frequently identified increased strength with faster recovery from training and better overall appearance as prominent advantages of AS use. Conversely, hair loss, gynecomastia, acne, aggression, erectile dysfunction, altered libido, hypogonadism, infertility, and injection related discomfort were commonly identified disadvantages of AS use. Lastly, individuals using AS report having consulted many different sources to learn about appropriate dosing, techniques, and side effects. These sources ranged from peers, coaches, online forums, social media, and scientific research articles, but rarely included healthcare professionals. Conclusions: This study identified the need for education and research in exploring the impact of AS use. A variety of AS exist on the market, yet information pertaining to the side effect profiles of these AS from a patient’s perspective is lacking and exploration of this topic is warranted. Further investigation as to the impact of user education on their understanding of the risks versus the benefits of AS use must also be conducted. Presentation: 6/1/2024