Abstract

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade is currently being investigated as adjuvant therapy in localized RCC; however, the role of PD-1/PD-L1 in this setting is not yet clear. In a multicenter retrospective study we evaluated PD-L1 status in 770 patients with metastatic or recurrent RCC treated by systemic therapy (ARCHERY study). Here we examined the subset with recurrent RCC. Of 770 patients, we analyzed 381 with localized RCC who had undergone radical nephrectomy (RN) but had subsequent recurrence. Time to recurrence (TTR) defined as time from RN to date of recurrence and overall survival (OS) defined as time from RN to death from any cause, were evaluated. Hazard ratio (HR) for PD-L1-positive status (as evaluated by the VENTANA SP142 immune cell scoring method) vs PD-L1-negative status and confidence interval (CI) was estimated by the Cox proportional hazard model. We performed a subgroup analysis based on defined High risk (n=201) and Low risk (n=160) subgroups based on clinical stage and Fuhrman grade. Of the 381 patients, 120 (31.5%) were PD-L1-positive. Clinical stage and Fuhrman grade distribution in PD-L1-positive vs –negative was as below; Stage I+II (36.7% vs 45.6%) / III+IV (59.2% vs 48.7%), Fuhrman Gr2 (18.3% vs 49.0%) / Gr3 (58.3% vs 44.4%) / Gr4 (22.5% vs 6.1%). Both TTR and OS were worse in PD-L1-positive than -negative patients: TTR HR 1.46 (95%CI 1.17–1.81), median TTR 12.1 vs 21.9 months; OS HR 1.32 (95%CI 1.00–1.75), median OS 75.8 vs 97.7 months. In both High and Low risk subgroups PD-L1-positive patients had shorter TTR: In the High risk group median TTR was 7.6 vs 15.3 months (HR 1.49 [95%CI 1.11–2.00]); in the Low risk group it was 24.1 vs 29.3 months (HR 1.26 [95%CI 0.88–1.80]). In the High risk group (but not the Low risk group) PD-L1-positive patients had shorter OS: In the High risk group median OS was 55.2 vs 83.5 months (HR 1.53 [95%CI 1.06–2.21]); in the Low risk group it was 94.6 vs 110.9 months (HR 1.05 [95%CI 0.66–1.68]). Our results suggest that PD-L1 expression may play a role in recurrence risk and OS, especially in high-risk patients. Of note, nuclear grade was found to be higher in PD-L1-positive patients, which merits further investigation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.