Abstract

We previously reported that a combination of HU, FA and 5FU was better than FA + 5FU (RR: 30% vs 22%; ASCO 463,1992). From January 1992,237 pts with histological diagnosis of ACRC, with evidence of advanced disease, not previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomized between arm A: I-FA (250mg/m2 in a 2 hour IV infusion) and 5FU (600mg/m2 IV bolus, 1 hour after FA) plus HU (3000mg, day I, given per os in three administrations, every 8 hrs, 6 hrs after 5FU) or arm B: FU (600mg/m2 IV bolus) plus HU as arm A and IFN (3×10Ul/m2, sc three times a week). On both arms treatment was given weekly for 6 wks followed by a 2 wk rest period. At the time of this analysis, a total of 203 (86%) pts. are evaluablefor response: 102 (86%) and 101 (86%) in arms A and B respectively. The analysed patients are comparable for median age (63 vs 63), sex (M:66 vs 61, F: 36 vs 40), PS (100&–80: 89 vs 88; 70–60%: 13 vs 13). Preliminary analysis shows the following results: on arm A 28 (28%) CR + PR, 45 (44%) NC, 29 (28%) P and on arm B 8 (8%) CR+ PR, 41 (41%) NC, 52 (51%) P. Diarrhea, mucositis and vomiting are the most frequent non-haematological side effects in both arms. Two pts died due to severe gastrointestinal toxicity (diarrhea and mucositis) one on each arm. We previously reported that a combination of HU, FA and 5FU was better than FA + 5FU (RR: 30% vs 22%; ASCO 463,1992). From January 1992,237 pts with histological diagnosis of ACRC, with evidence of advanced disease, not previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomized between arm A: I-FA (250mg/m2 in a 2 hour IV infusion) and 5FU (600mg/m2 IV bolus, 1 hour after FA) plus HU (3000mg, day I, given per os in three administrations, every 8 hrs, 6 hrs after 5FU) or arm B: FU (600mg/m2 IV bolus) plus HU as arm A and IFN (3×10Ul/m2, sc three times a week). On both arms treatment was given weekly for 6 wks followed by a 2 wk rest period. At the time of this analysis, a total of 203 (86%) pts. are evaluablefor response: 102 (86%) and 101 (86%) in arms A and B respectively. The analysed patients are comparable for median age (63 vs 63), sex (M:66 vs 61, F: 36 vs 40), PS (100&–80: 89 vs 88; 70–60%: 13 vs 13). Preliminary analysis shows the following results: on arm A 28 (28%) CR + PR, 45 (44%) NC, 29 (28%) P and on arm B 8 (8%) CR+ PR, 41 (41%) NC, 52 (51%) P. Diarrhea, mucositis and vomiting are the most frequent non-haematological side effects in both arms. Two pts died due to severe gastrointestinal toxicity (diarrhea and mucositis) one on each arm.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.