Abstract

Abstract Background Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea in the United States. This burden is more prevalent and severe in the oncologic population and is associated with greater morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic modalities are limited, and misdiagnosis is high with resultant mismanaged care – inappropriate antibiotics, and potentially missed opportunities for appropriate targeted care towards graft-versus-host disease or other etiologies. To date, no large-scale evaluations have been performed to characterize the incidence of true disease in this population or to help delineate predictive markers for true infections (cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) positivity). Methods This is a multi-center, prospective stool banking study from January 2020 to date enrolling pediatric patients with an oncologic diagnosis admitted at Advocate Children’s Hospital and Comer Children’s Hospital. Stool was collected weekly along with relevant clinical histories and symptomology. Isolates of C. difficile were cultured and CCNA performed. Stool was also collected during episodes of PCR diagnosed CDI. Results 65 unique subjects were enrolled over 183 admissions. 11 samples from 10 patients were thought to represent CDI with PCR positivity noted. Five of these specimens were confirmed as CCNA positive while the remainder did not have active toxin presence. Bristol type 4 stools or > 3 stools in 24 hours were significant factors for modeling CCNA positivity, but not for modeling PCR positivity. Notably 26 stool specimens were CCNA positive, and 21 did not have PCR tests done. Among all CCNA positive specimens, no significant difference was noted in symptomatology or antibiotic use. Conclusion Differentiating true CDI can be challenging. However, even in patients with high risk of alternative GI pathology, the frequency of stooling and stool characteristics can be used. Although considered the gold standard for assessment of disease, CCNA positivity in this population was noted in patients who were not evaluated for disease by their primary providers. Underdiagnosis is possible, but potentially less likely given the absence of clinically significant differentiation in symptoms. Host factors predisposing to disease are likely present. Disclosures Larry K. Kociolek, MD, MSCI, Merck: Grant/Research Support

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call