Abstract
The goal of this chapter was to present a host of arguments against the widespread assumption that verbs take thematic arguments. The arguments have been drawn from facts about distributive readings, focus, and variable verbal adicity. A number of counter-arguments have also been addressed and it argues that these arguments do not undermine the case for severing thematic arguments from the verb. The chapter discusses possible consequences of this view for the syntax-semantics interface and argued that the mapping should rely on the functional structure of the sentence. The most important take-home message is that there are several arguments against the widespread assumption that verbs have argument structure that is reflected in the grammar. If the arguments given in the chapter are correct, then verbs might simply be monadic for the purposes of the grammar. Keywords: argument structure; thematic arguments
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.