Abstract
This chapter focuses on the Supreme Court's decisions addressing when parties have agreed to class arbitration, and, importantly, reviewing arbitral awards on that question. Arbitration agreements almost never expressly authorize arbitration to proceed on a class basis. Conversely, arbitration agreements often, although not always, expressly preclude class arbitration i. e, include class arbitration waivers. The enforceability of class arbitration waivers has been the subject of much litigation, culminating in ATpT Mobility LLC v. Concepcion and American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant . The chapter describes how the Court's class arbitration journey began with Bazzle and continues on the journey with Stolt-Nielsen. It offers some thoughts on the issue still unresolved after all three cases who decide whether a silent arbitration clause authorizes class arbitration. Keywords: arbitral awards; Bazzle ; class arbitration; Stolt-Nielsen; Supreme Court
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.