7 g weighted versus unweighted polyurethane nasoenteral tubes—Spontaneous transpyloric passage and clinical performance: a controlled randomised trial

Abstract

A proportion of patients requiring enteral nutrition is at increased risk of regurgitation or pulmonary aspiration of enteral diet as a result of gastric atony or paresis. The positioning of the distal end of an enteral feeding tube beyond the pylorus into duodenum or jejunum may reduce this risk. It has been postulated that by suitable lengthening of feeding tubes and by altering the distal end tip profile or by the addition of a weight, spontaneous passage of a tube through the pylorus after pernasal insertion may be achieved. In a recent controlled trial we were unable to demonstrate any advantage to a) modifying the tip profile or b) the addition of a 2.4 g weight. This prospective controlled clinical study examined the difference between an unweighted polyurethane tube which had performed optimally in the previous study and a new 7 g weighted tube similar in all other respects. In both cases less than 50% of tubes had passed spontaneously through the pylorus when assessed at 24 h, with no significant difference in performance (p = 0.38). When comparing overall length of time that each tube remained in situ, there was similarly no significant difference between the 7 g weighted and unweighted tubes (p = 0.277). We conclude that the addition of a 7 g weight to a suitably lengthened enteral feeding tube confers no advantage on either incidence of spontaneous transpyloric passage or in prolonging tube usage. If post-pyloric feeding is indicated for a patient, positioning by either fluoroscopic or endoscopic techniques should be undertaken.