Abstract

As of 2017, the Civil Service English Exam (CSEE) Grade 7 at the national level (G7.N) was replaced with these five EFL tests: TOEIC, TOEFL, TEPS, G-TELP and FLEX. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether the replacement of the CSEE G7.N with the five EFL tests is reasonable in terms of construct validity, authenticity and impact proposed by Bachman and Palmer. This study yielded three significant results. First, the five EFL tests did not satisfy the construct validity in order to be used as an alternative to the CSEE G7.N even though they are known to be a reliable measure of English proficiency. Second, in regards to the authenticity analysis of the five EFL tests, TOEFL and G-TELP were found to have the lowest degree of authenticity while TEPS and TOEIC both displayed a fairly high degree of authenticity. Finally, the results of the questionnaire survey on test takers’attitudes and perceptions regarding the EFL tests in general were found to indicate that the CSEE G7.N’s replacement with the five EFL tests may not bring a positive impact either on individual test takers or our society. The implications of this study suggest that based on the specific purpose and target population, rather than utilize the five EFL tests, the CSEE G7.N should be developed by including test items more related to civil servants’ job descriptions to fulfill the need for construct validity, authenticity, and positive impact both on candidates and society.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.