Abstract

Neonatal brachial plexus injury (BPI) is readily apparent on clinical examination and is most commonly a consequence of shoulder impaction at vaginal delivery. After an institutional analysis of BPI in 1994 – 1998 [1] showed an incidence of 1.5/1000 births, specific staff training in management of shoulder dystocia was introduced with a view to avoiding BPI. We describe a re-evaluation of recent cases of BPI following these measures. All infants with neonatal evidence of BPI were prospectively identified during 2004 – 2008. Injuries were categorized as transient or persistent (neurological impairment persisting beyond 1 year), correlated with maternal details and intrapartum events and compared with the earlier reported series. Of 41,828 deliveries from 2004 – 08, there were 72 cases of BPI identified (1.7/1000), compared to 54 cases (1.5/1000) from 1994 – 98. (p =0.4); 9 cases (12.5%) were persistent in 2004 – 08, compared with 10 cases (18.5%) in 1994 – 98. (p =0.4). Instrumental delivery was a significantly commoner antecedent in 2004 -08 than in 1994 – 1999 (55% vs. 13%; p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two time periods in respect of maternal parity, obesity/gestational weight gain or prolonged pregnancy. The proportion of birthweights greater than 4.0kg was also identical at 19%, although the cesarean section (CS) rate had increased from 10.7% to 18.4%. Four cases (6%) in 2004-08 occurred following CS compared with 1 (2%) earlier case. Despite specific staff training to counter shoulder dystocia and a rising institutional CS rate, the incidence of both transient and persistent BPI has remained virtually unchanged compared with 10 years earlier.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.