68Ga-FAPI-04 PET for Surveillance of Anastomotic Recurrence in Postoperative Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: a Comparative Study with 18F-FDG PET.

Abstract

This study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET and 18F-FDG PET for detecting anastomotic recurrence in postoperative patients with gastrointestinal cancer, and to characterize the signal pattern over time at surgical wounds on both PET imaging. Gastrointestinal cancer patients who planned to 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for postoperative surveillance were involved. The SUVmax at surgical wounds were assessed. Endoscopic pathology confirmed anastomotic recurrence or it was ruled out by imaging and clinical follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and accuracy of the two PET imaging in detecting anastomotic recurrence were compared. Relationships between tracer uptake at surgical wounds and postoperative time were also analyzed. Compared with non-recurrent patients, the recurrent patients exhibited a significantly higher anastomotic SUVmax on 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET (SUVmax: 9.92 ± 4.36 vs. 2.81 ± 1.86, P = 0.002). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of detecting anastomotic recurrence were 100.0%, 87.3%, 41.7%, 100.0%, and 88.3% for 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET, and 60.0%, 81.8%, 23.1%, 95.7%, and 80.0% for 18F-FDG PET, respectively. Although 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET signal at surgical wounds showed a slight trend to decrease with time, no statistical difference was observed over months post-surgery (P > 0.05). Both tracers displayed high NPVs in identifying anastomotic recurrence with a higher sensitivity to 68Ga-FAPI-04. Tracer uptake at anastomotic sites does not decrease significantly over time, which results in low PPVs for both PET. Therefore, it is difficult to differentiate anastomotic recurrence from inflammation on either PET imaging.