Abstract
alphavbeta3 integrins are important cell adhesion receptors involved in angiogenic processes. Recently, we demonstrated using [(18)F]Galacto-RGD that monitoring of alphavbeta3 expression is feasible. Here, we introduce (68)Ga- and (111)In-labelled derivatives and compare them with [(18)F]Galacto-RGD. For radiolabelling, cyclo(RGDfK(DOTA)) was synthesised using SPPS. For in vitro characterisation determination of partition coefficients, protein binding, metabolic stability, alphavbeta3 affinity and cell uptake and for in vivo characterization, biodistribution studies and micro positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were carried out. For in vivo and in vitro studies, human melanoma M21 (alphavbeta3 positive) and M21-L (alphavbeta3 negative) cells were used. Both tracers can be synthesised straightforward. The compounds showed hydrophilic properties and high metabolic stability. Up to 23% protein-bound activity for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD and only up to 1.4% for [(111)In]DOTA-RGD was found. Cell uptake studies indicate receptor-specific accumulation. This is confirmed by the biodistribution data. One hour p.i. accumulation in alphavbeta3-positive tumours was 2.9 +/- 0.3%ID/g and in alphavbeta3-negative tumours 0.8 +/- 0.1%ID/g for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD ([(111)In]DOTA-RGD: 1.9 +/- 0.3%ID/g and 0.5 +/- 0.2%ID/g; [(18)F]Galacto-RGD: 1.6 +/- 0.2%ID/g and 0.4 +/- 0.1%ID/g). Thus, tumour uptake ratios were comparable. Due to approx. 3-fold higher blood pool activities for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD, tumour/blood ratios were higher for [(111)In]DOTA-RGD and [(18)F]Galacto-RGD. However, microPET studies demonstrated that visualisation of alphavbeta3-positive tumours using [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD is possible. Our data indicate that [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD allows monitoring of alphavbeta3 expression. Especially, the much easier radiosynthesis compared to [(18)F]Galacto-RGD would make it an attractive alternative. However, due to higher blood pool activity, [(18)F]Galacto-RGD remains superior for imaging alphavbeta3 expression. Introduction of alternative chelator systems may overcome the disadvantages.
Paper version not known (Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.