Abstract
Abstract Disclosure: V. Vimalananda: None. S. Qian: None. R. Bolton: None. A. Hung: None. V. Smith: None. M. Maciejewski: None. Introduction: Obesity is a prevalent and costly chronic disease that compromises quality of life; increases risks of cardiometabolic disease, osteoarthritis, and several cancers; and accounts for 28% of U.S. health care costs. Anti-obesity medications (AOMs) may fill the treatment gap given the low uptake of bariatric surgery and limited effectiveness of behavioral interventions, and are guideline-recommended as part of a comprehensive obesity treatment plan. The landscape for obesity treatment has changed with introduction of the highly effective and in-demand glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual GLP-1 + GIP receptor agonists (GIP/GLP-1 RAs). Given limited knowledge of use patterns, we describe use of AOMs among patients receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration (VA), which is the largest integrated health system in the United States. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study of VA patients from 7/1/2021-6/30/2023, we examined data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse separately for patients on AOMs without and with diagnosed diabetes, since the newer AOMs can be used at lower doses for the diabetes indication. Results: There were 31,106 patients without diabetes and at least one AOM prescription in the two year study period, who were 60% male and 62% White. AOM prescriptions from Year 1 to Year 2 among this group increased 215%. Overall, prescriptions were: semaglutide 34%, liraglutide 18%, orlistat 18%, phentermine/topiramate 14%, bupropion/naltrexone 12%, phentermine 4% and tirzepatide 0.03%. Prescribers were physicians 60%, LIPs 25%, and pharmacists 13%. There were 188,017 patients with diagnosed diabetes and at least one AOM prescription, and they were 92% male and 67% white. AOM prescriptions from Year 1 to Year 2 among this group increased 14% and were primarily (87%) for semaglutide. Prescribers were physicians 63%, licensed independent practitioners (LIPs) 23%, and pharmacists 10%. Conclusions AOM use is increasing in VA across all AOM classes, particularly among patients without diabetes, indicating growing interest in medical treatment of obesity. As AOM use spreads, real-world evidence on weight loss and clinical outcomes is needed among patients like those in VA who tend to be older and less healthy than the highly selected patients included in randomized clinical trials. Data is especially needed to guide practice among patients with obesity and without diabetes, given the dramatic increase in use among that group over the past 2 years. Presentation: 6/1/2024
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.