685. Evaluating the Role of Medication-assisted Treatment (MAT) in the Management of Infectious Endocarditis in People Who Inject Drugs (PWID)

Abstract

Abstract Background An estimated 1.29-2.59 million people practice intravenous drug use (IVDU) in the United States making it a growing risk factor for infective endocarditis (IE). In people who inject drugs (PWID), IE accounts for 5-10% of total yearly deaths. IE often requires weeks of intravenous therapy with extensive medical follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if medication-assisted treatment (MAT) increased treatment retention and survival to optimize addiction assistance and IE treatment efforts. Methods A single-center, retrospective chart review was approved for patients admitted with an ICD-10 code of IE. A multidisciplinary group was created in April, 2019 aimed to improve endocarditis patient outcomes, formed of complex case coordination, infectious disease, cardiology, and pharmacy pain management service members. The historical period was January 1, 2018-March 31, 2019 and the IE pathway (IEP) group was April 1, 2019-June 30, 2020. Patients were excluded if there was no documentation of IVDU (Figure 1). The primary outcome was successful endocarditis therapy, defined per study protocol. Secondary outcomes include: against medical advice (AMA) departures, discharge naloxone prescriptions, clinical opioid withdrawal score (COWS) and patient reported pain. Figure 1. Study Population Methods for study population inclusion and exclusion Results A total of 419 IE patients were evaluated with 166 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was achieved in 51.2% of historical group and 48.8% of the IEP group (p=0.302). AMA departures and inpatient mortality were similar between the two groups. There was increased presence of the pharmacy pain management service with decreased time to consult in the IEP group (Figure 2). Last documented COWS were increased in the IEP group (p=0.002), while last reported patient pain scores decreased (p=0.030). More patients were started on MAT and discharged with naloxone in the IEP group (Table 3). Readmission was found to be higher in the IEP group (p=0.046). Post hoc analysis evaluating outcomes for patients seen by the endocarditis pathway team were similar between the two groups (Table 4). Figure 2. Secondary Outcome (Consult Services) The secondary outcomes of the study population are described comparing the presence and time to various consult services. **P-value indicates statistical significance. Abbreviations: n, number; ID, infectious disease; CT, cardiothoracic Table 3. Secondary Outcomes Table 4. Post Hoc Analysis Conclusion The multidisciplinary group was effective helping to guide the inpatient care of PWID and improve symptom management, but this did not translate to increased successful IE therapy or fewer readmissions. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures