68 Urinary Catheterisation in Trauma and Orthopaedic Patients

Abstract

Abstract Background The use of urinary catheterisation in neck of femur fracture patients is often debated as common best practice to manage and appropriate fluid assessment. Routine catheterisation increases the risk bacteraemia, genitourinary injury, worsening mobility, risk of pressure sores and predisposition to delirium and falls. There is a need for increased awareness of urinary catheterisation management in conjunction with healthcare-associated infections. NHS improvement has issued a letter aiming to half healthcare-associated Gram-negative bacteraemia, the majority of which is catheter-related. This project aims to identify barriers to safe catheter care in the orthopaedic population; by determining if management of urinary catheters is complaint with NICE quality standards (QS61). Introduction Appropriate perioperative care can help manage the associated risk of neck of femur fractures. The British Hip Society and British Orthopaedic Association have provided little guidance on postoperative care and risk management. Appropriate catheter care will improve overall patient care but reducing mortality and associated morbidity, by shortening stay by early mobilisation and management of complications. Methods All catheterised trauma and orthopaedic patients in a district general hospital over one month (February) were included 67% of which had sustained neck of femur fractures. Data from nursing and doctors’ records on the following parameters were collected: demographics, the reason of admission, indication/location for catheterisation and responsible clinician; the number of days catheterised, the reason for the retention of catheterisation and management of suspected/confirmed catheter-related infection. Data were collected in April following the implementation. Intervention A urinary care pathway was launched based on the HOUDINI algorithm and educational seminars for medical and nursing staff were conducted. Results Mean age of patients was 78. Initial data was suggestive of poor documentation and prolonged, inappropriate retention of urinary catheterisation and not in accordance with current guidance. Data was recollected in April after the launch of the pathway; data was indicative of marginal improvement of catheter care management, reduced time of catheter retention, improved documentation likelihood of review. Conclusions Incorporating a catheter care pathway in managing orthopaedic patients has shown improvement in the overall documentation and management of urinary catheterisation. Despite this improvement demonstrated, implementation of the pathway is still substandard. This pathway will be incorporated into an innovative integrated neck of femur pathway in June.