668 Inguinal Hernia Repair: Are We Compliant with The Recommended Consent Process?

Abstract

Abstract Aim Inguinal hernia repairs are one of the most commonly performed operative procedures in the UK. An adequate consent process gives the patient the autonomy in making decisions related to their care and treatment. In this project, we were auditing whether hernia patients have gone through a standardised consent process from time clinic presentation up to the day of surgery. Method This was a retrospective audit based on the Royal College of Surgeons’ (Good Surgical Practice) guidelines and trust local policy. We assessed 50 case notes for patients who had inguinal hernia repair between November 2019 and November 2020 in two of the busy district general hospitals in the UK. Results We found that our practice was fully compliant with documenting patient demographics, signatures, and the name of the procedure in the consent forms. Documented discussion prior to surgery was found only on79% of clinic letters. Poor compliance was noted in documenting some of the possible risks in the consent form including testicular atrophy (59%), injury to vas, vessels, and nerves (56%), wound complications (49%), chest infection (24%). Zero compliance was noted in documentation missed hernia and mortality as potential risks to the procedure. Conclusions A detailed documented discussion with the patient in relation to benefits, risks, and alternatives of surgery should take place on clinic presentation as well as on the day of surgery to ensure compliance with the consent process.