658 Surgical and Medical Treatment of GERD Lead to a Comparable Increase in Baseline Impedance Levels

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Presence of pepsin in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, laryngeal biopsy and sputum may be a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A novel noninvasive test to detect it in saliva/sputum (PEP-Test) has been proposed to diagnose GERD. A correlation between PEP-Test and multichannel impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH) has never been performed. AIM: The aim was to evaluate the PEP-Test accuracy for the diagnosis of GERD in patients with reflux symptoms by means of MII-pH. PATIENTS ANDMETHODS: 35 patients with GER symptoms were studied. All patients with negative endoscopy underwent pathophysiological examinations, after wash-out from proton pump inhibitors. Samples of saliva/sputum were obtained by requesting the patient to cough up and spit into a tube containing 0.01 M citric acid within 15 minutes from experiencing reflux symptoms. Patients were grouped on the basis of MII-pH results as follows: True-NERD (increased acid exposure time, AET/reflux number); Hypersensitive Esophagus, HE (normal AET/reflux number, positive symptom association probability index, SAP); no-GERD patients (normal AET/reflux number, negative SAP). Roc curve was performed to obtain diagnostic accuracy of test. RESULTS: Male/Female was 18/17, mean age was 49.8 yrs, mean BMI was 24.9. The mean BMI was similar in three sub-groups. Nine patients were abitudinary smokers and five had a regular alimentary alcohol use. Eleven out of thirty-five patients presented hiatal hernia. No patients showed abnormal esophageal motility. MII-pH results showed: 16 True-NERD patients (median AET 9.5); 12 HE (median AET 3); 7 no-GERD (median AET 1.1). PEPTest was positive in 93.7% of True-NERD, in 58.3% of HE, and negative in 100% of noGERD patients. Accuracy of PEP-Test is reported in Table 1. CONCLUSIONS: PEP-Test is a simple, economic, reproducible, highly specific test to detect the presence of GERD. Accuracy PEP-Test