Abstract
BackgroundSpecies belonging to the Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus (ABC) complex, such as A. baumannii, A. pittii and A. nosocomialis, are a major cause of hospital acquired infections and outbreaks with increasing occurrence of multidrug-resistance. Sulbactam-durlobactam (SUD), a combination of one active β-lactam antibiotic (sulbactam) with a new β-lactamase inhibitor (durlobactam), is currently being tested in a phase 3 clinical trial by Entasis Therapeutics for the treatment of serious infections caused by ABC, including multidrug-resistant strains. At the same time, an ETEST® SUD (sulbactam-durlobactam - MIC range 0.004/4-64/4 µg/mL) has been developed and calibrated versus the broth microdilution reference method (BMD) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). This test is intended to determine the MIC of sulbactam-durlobactam for species of the ABC complex. The aim of this study was to perform a first comparative study of ETEST SUD with the CLSI BMD method on a panel of 263 isolates.MethodsThe panel consisted of 204 A. baumannii, 29 A. pittii, 30 A. nosocomialis, including 24 SUD-resistant strains, and one CLSI QC strain. BMD was performed using the 2021 CLSI guidelines. ETEST SUD was evaluated using the standard ETEST procedure for Acinetobacter spp. (inoculum 0.5 McFarland, Mueller Hinton medium, incubation at 35°C for 20-24h). For each method, the MIC was read at complete inhibition of visible growth. To determine category agreement (CA) and error rates, the sulbactam-durlobactam provisional breakpoint of 4 µg/mL was applied.ResultsThe QC strain MICs were in the expected range with reproducible results. The essential MIC agreement [EA, ±1 dilution] was 97.7% without any tendency to over- or underestimate the MIC when compared to BMD. The CA was 98.5%. Two Very Major Errors, both within the EA, and two Major Errors, one within the EA, were observed.ConclusionIn this study, the ETEST SUD was found to be equivalent to the CLSI reference method. MIC end points were easy to read. With a 15-dilution range and simplicity of use, ETEST SUD could represent a valuable tool for MIC determination and could be an alternative to BMD.For Research Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not been established yet.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
