652The effect of varying irrigation flow rate during irrigated radiofrequency ablation on optimising lesion shape

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Investigator Sponsored Research grant from Boston Scientific Introduction Irrigated catheters are the standard tool for radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the left atrium and ventricles. However, pathological studies of irrigated RF lesions show a "tear-drop" shape, with the widest diameter some depth below the endocardial surface and relative endocardial sparing. This requires overlap of lesions to achieve contiguity at the endocardial surface. There has been little investigation into the effect of altering irrigation rate on lesion shape and volume. Purpose To test the hypothesis that varying the irrigation flow rate would optimise lesion shape by minimising endocardial sparing while maintaining lesion depth. Methods In an ex vivo animal heart model, irrigated ablation lesions were performed in porcine ventricular tissue at 30W using an Intellatip MiFi OI catheter with 5 different irrigation protocols: A. fixed rate (30ml/min); B. continuous reduction (30 to 2ml/min over 30s); C. continuous increase (2 to 30ml/min over 30s); D. stepwise reduction (30ml/min (10s) to 16ml/min (10s) to 2ml/min (10s)); E. stepwise increase (2ml/min (10s) to 16ml/min (10s) to 30ml/min (10s). Contact force (10g) and ablation duration (30s) were constant. Steam pops during ablation were recorded. Tissue sections were stained with triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) after ablation to allow accurate measurement of lesion boundaries. Surface diameter, lesion depth, maximum diameter, and depth at maximum diameter were measured using Vernier Calipers to calculate lesion volume. Pictures of lesions were analysed further by ImageJ software to measure the degree of endocardial sparing. The optimal protocol was further tested against fixed-rate irrigation at 20W – 40W. Results 10-20 lesions were performed for each irrigation protocol. Of the 4 experimental protocols, continuous reduction (protocol B) resulted in the most optimal lesion shape (Figure). With this protocol, endocardial sparing area was significantly reduced compared to fixed-rate irrigation (1.61 vs. 2.64mm2, P < 0.0001), with a trend towards an increase in surface diameter (9.25 vs. 8.46mm, P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in lesion depth (5.35 vs. 4.77mm), lesion volume (374 vs. 332mm3) or maximum diameter (10.3 vs. 10.8mm). Steam pop occurred in 1 of 20 (5%) lesions in each of protocols A and B. Significantly reduced endocardial sparing with preserved volume/depth was consistent for continuous reduction when compared to fixed-rate irrigation across power settings of 20W (17ml/min), 30 W (17ml/min or 30ml/min) and 40W (30ml/min) (P < 0.0001). Conclusions Continuous reduction in irrigation flow rate from 30 to 2ml/min during irrigated RF ablation results in reduced endocardial sparing with preserved lesion depth and volume when compared to fixed-rate irrigation across power settings of 20 – 40W. This may allow for greater lesion spacing while maintaining endocardial contiguity and merits further investigation to improve irrigated RF ablation efficiency. Abstract Figure