Abstract
AbstractObjective and subjective indicators and methods for comparing the effects of three‐dimensional display technologies on viewer discomfort, fatigue, and satisfaction based on human factors were proposed. Based on 7 indicators (including VA, diopter, pupil size, IOP, HFC, CSV and CFF) and the ergonomic evaluation, the conclusion that PR and deadzone‐free AS displays are better than SG displays could be drawn. In the meantime, a relationship between the visual discomfort/fatigue indicators and causes of physiological feedbacks was inferred from analyzing the experimental data and consulting with the ophthalmologist.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
